People, business teams, and native governments submitted over 10,000 feedback to the White Home about its work-in-progress nationwide AI coverage, also called the AI Motion Plan. The White Home Workplace of Science and Know-how Coverage (OSTP) on Thursday printed the textual content of the submissions in a PDF spanning 18,480 pages.
The feedback, which contact on matters starting from copyright to the environmental harms of AI knowledge facilities, come as President Donald Trump and allies rejigger the U.S. authorities’s AI priorities.
In January, President Trump repealed former President Joe Biden’s AI Govt Order, which had instructed the Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Know-how to writer steerage that helps firms establish — and proper for — flaws in fashions, together with biases. Critics allied with Trump argued that the order’s reporting necessities had been onerous and successfully pressured firms to reveal their commerce secrets and techniques.
Shortly after revoking the AI Govt Order, Trump signed an order directing federal companies to advertise the event of AI “free from ideological bias” that promotes “human flourishing, financial competitiveness, and nationwide safety.” Importantly, Trump’s order made no point out of combating AI discrimination, which was a key tenet of Biden’s initiative.
Feedback submitted to the White Home clarify what’s at stake within the AI race.
Various commenters asserted that AI is exploitative, in a phrase, skilled on the works of creatives who aren’t compensated for his or her involuntary contributions, and petitioned the Trump administration to strengthen copyright regulation. On the opposing facet, commenters comparable to VC agency Andreessen Horowitz accused rightsholders of placing up roadblocks to AI growth.
A number of AI firms, together with Google and OpenAI, have additionally pushed for friendlier guidelines round AI coaching in earlier feedback on the AI Motion Plan.
Petitions from organizations together with People for Prosperity, The Way forward for Life Institute, and the American Academy of Nursing emphasised the significance of investments in analysis at a time when the federal authorities is slashing scientific grants. AI specialists have criticized the Trump administration’s latest cuts to scientific grant-making, and, particularly, reductions championed by billionaire Elon Musk’s Division of Authorities Effectivity.
Some commenters on the AI Motion Plan took purpose on the Trump administration’s far-ranging tariffs on overseas items, suggesting that they might hurt home AI efforts. The Knowledge Heart Coalition, a commerce affiliation representing the info heart sector, says tariffs on infrastructure parts “will restrict and sluggish” U.S. AI investments. Elsewhere, the Info Know-how Business Council, an advocacy group whose members embody Amazon, Intel, and Microsoft, urged “sensible” tariffs that “shield home industries with out escalating commerce wars that hurt shoppers.”
Solely a handful of feedback talked about “AI censorship,” a subject high of thoughts for a lot of of Trump’s shut confidants. Elon Musk and crypto and AI “czar” David Sacks have alleged that fashionable chatbots censor conservative viewpoints, with Sacks singling out ChatGPT particularly as untruthful about politically delicate topics.
In fact, bias in AI is an intractable technical downside. Musk’s AI firm, xAI, has itself struggled to create a chatbot that doesn’t endorse some political opinions over others.
President Trump has ramped up efforts to assemble an AI coverage crew in latest months.
In March, the Senate confirmed Trump’s choose for director of the OSTP, Michael Kratsios, who targeted on AI coverage within the OSTP throughout Trump’s first time period. Towards the tip of final 12 months, Trump named former VC Sriram Krishnan because the White Home’s senior coverage advisor for AI.
