Google DeepMind introduced Monday that a sophisticated model of its Gemini synthetic intelligence mannequin has formally achieved gold medal-level efficiency on the Worldwide Mathematical Olympiad, fixing 5 of six exceptionally troublesome issues and incomes recognition as the primary AI system to obtain official gold-level grading from competitors organizers.
The victory advances the sphere of AI reasoning and places Google forward within the intensifying battle between tech giants constructing next-generation synthetic intelligence. Extra importantly, it demonstrates that AI can now deal with advanced mathematical issues utilizing pure language understanding relatively than requiring specialised programming languages.
“Official outcomes are in — Gemini achieved gold-medal degree within the Worldwide Mathematical Olympiad!” Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, wrote on social media platform X Monday morning. “A complicated model was in a position to remedy 5 out of 6 issues. Unbelievable progress.”
Official outcomes are in – Gemini achieved gold-medal degree within the Worldwide Mathematical Olympiad! ? A complicated model was in a position to remedy 5 out of 6 issues. Unbelievable progress – large congrats to @lmthang and the crew! https://t.co/pp9bXF7rVj
— Demis Hassabis (@demishassabis) July 21, 2025
The Worldwide Mathematical Olympiad, held yearly since 1959, is extensively thought-about the world’s most prestigious arithmetic competitors for pre-university college students. Every collaborating nation sends six elite younger mathematicians to compete in fixing six exceptionally difficult issues spanning algebra, combinatorics, geometry, and quantity idea. Solely about 8% of human individuals usually earn gold medals.
How Google DeepMind’s Gemini Deep Suppose cracked math’s hardest issues
Google’s newest success far exceeds its 2024 efficiency, when the corporate’s mixed AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry methods earned silver medal standing by fixing 4 of six issues. That earlier system required human specialists to first translate pure language issues into domain-specific programming languages after which interpret the AI’s mathematical output.
This 12 months’s breakthrough got here by way of Gemini Deep Suppose, an enhanced reasoning system that employs what researchers name “parallel considering.” In contrast to conventional AI fashions that observe a single chain of reasoning, Deep Suppose concurrently explores a number of doable options earlier than arriving at a remaining reply.
“Our mannequin operated end-to-end in pure language, producing rigorous mathematical proofs instantly from the official downside descriptions,” Hassabis defined in a follow-up put up on the social media web site X, emphasizing that the system accomplished its work inside the competitors’s commonplace 4.5-hour time restrict.
We achieved this 12 months’s spectacular end result utilizing a sophisticated model of Gemini Deep Suppose (an enhanced reasoning mode for advanced issues). Our mannequin operated end-to-end in pure language, producing rigorous mathematical proofs instantly from the official downside descriptions –…
— Demis Hassabis (@demishassabis) July 21, 2025
The mannequin achieved 35 out of a doable 42 factors, comfortably exceeding the gold medal threshold. In response to IMO President Prof. Dr. Gregor Dolinar, the options had been “astonishing in lots of respects” and located to be “clear, exact and most of them straightforward to observe” by competitors graders.
OpenAI faces backlash for bypassing official competitors guidelines
The announcement comes amid rising rigidity within the AI business over aggressive practices and transparency. Google DeepMind’s measured method to releasing its outcomes has drawn reward from the AI neighborhood, notably in distinction to rival OpenAI’s dealing with of comparable achievements.
“We didn’t announce on Friday as a result of we revered the IMO Board’s unique request that each one AI labs share their outcomes solely after the official outcomes had been verified by unbiased specialists & the scholars had rightly acquired the acclamation they deserved,” Hassabis wrote, showing to reference OpenAI’s earlier announcement of its personal olympiad efficiency.
Btw as an apart, we didn’t announce on Friday as a result of we revered the IMO Board’s unique request that each one AI labs share their outcomes solely after the official outcomes had been verified by unbiased specialists & the scholars had rightly acquired the acclamation they deserved
— Demis Hassabis (@demishassabis) July 21, 2025
Social media customers had been fast to notice the excellence. “You see? OpenAI ignored the IMO request. Disgrace. No class. Straight up disrespect,” wrote one consumer. “Google DeepMind acted with integrity, aligned with humanity.”
The criticism stems from OpenAI’s choice to announce its personal mathematical olympiad outcomes with out collaborating within the official IMO analysis course of. As a substitute, OpenAI had a panel of former IMO individuals grade its AI’s efficiency, a method that some locally view as missing credibility.
“OpenAI is kind of presumably the worst firm on the planet proper now,” wrote one critic, whereas others prompt the corporate must “take issues significantly” and “be extra credible.”
You see?
OpenAI ignored the IMO request. Disgrace. No class. Straight up disrespect.
Google DeepMind acted with integrity, aligned with humanity.
TRVTHNUKE pic.twitter.com/8LAOak6XUE
— NIK (@ns123abc) July 21, 2025
Contained in the coaching strategies that powered Gemini’s mathematical mastery
Google DeepMind’s success seems to stem from novel coaching strategies that transcend conventional approaches. The crew used superior reinforcement studying strategies designed to leverage multi-step reasoning, problem-solving, and theorem-proving knowledge. The mannequin was additionally offered entry to a curated assortment of high-quality mathematical options and acquired particular steerage on approaching IMO-style issues.
The technical achievement impressed AI researchers who famous its broader implications. “Not simply fixing math… however understanding language-described issues and making use of summary logic to novel instances,” wrote AI observer Elyss Wren. “This isn’t rote reminiscence — that is emergent cognition in movement.”
Ethan Mollick, a professor on the Wharton Faculty who research AI, emphasised the importance of utilizing a general-purpose mannequin relatively than specialised instruments. “Rising proof of the flexibility of LLMs to generalize to novel downside fixing,” he wrote, highlighting how this differs from earlier approaches that required specialised mathematical software program.
It wasn’t simply OpenAI.
Google additionally used a basic goal mannequin to resolve the very laborious math issues of the Worldwide Math Olympiad in plain language. Final 12 months they used specialised software use
Rising proof of the flexibility of LLMs to generalize to novel downside fixing https://t.co/Ve72fFmx2b
— Ethan Mollick (@emollick) July 21, 2025
The mannequin demonstrated notably spectacular reasoning in a single downside the place many human opponents utilized graduate-level mathematical ideas. In response to DeepMind researcher Junehyuk Jung, Gemini “made an excellent commentary and used solely elementary quantity idea to create a self-contained proof,” discovering a extra elegant resolution than many human individuals.
What Google DeepMind’s victory means for the $200 billion AI race
The breakthrough comes at a essential second within the AI business, the place corporations are racing to reveal superior reasoning capabilities. The success has instant sensible implications: Google plans to make a model of this Deep Suppose mannequin accessible to mathematicians for testing earlier than rolling it out to Google AI Extremely subscribers, who pay $250 month-to-month for entry to the corporate’s most superior AI fashions.
The timing additionally highlights the intensifying competitors between main AI laboratories. Whereas Google celebrated its methodical, officially-verified method, the controversy surrounding OpenAI’s announcement displays broader tensions about transparency and credibility in AI improvement.
This aggressive dynamic extends past simply mathematical reasoning. Current weeks have seen numerous AI corporations announce breakthrough capabilities, although not all have been acquired positively. Elon Musk’s xAI lately launched Grok 4, which the corporate claimed was the “smartest AI on this planet,” although leaderboard scores confirmed it trailing behind fashions from Google and OpenAI. Moreover, Grok has confronted criticism for controversial options together with sexualized AI companions and episodes of producing antisemitic content material.
The daybreak of AI that thinks like people—with real-world penalties
The mathematical olympiad victory goes past aggressive bragging rights. Gemini’s efficiency demonstrates that AI methods can now match human-level reasoning in advanced duties requiring creativity, summary considering, and the flexibility to synthesize insights throughout a number of domains.
“This can be a important advance over final 12 months’s breakthrough end result,” the DeepMind crew famous of their technical announcement. The development from requiring specialised formal languages to working solely in pure language means that AI methods have gotten extra intuitive and accessible.
For companies, this improvement indicators that AI could quickly deal with advanced analytical issues throughout numerous industries with out requiring specialised programming or area experience. The flexibility to cause by way of intricate challenges utilizing on a regular basis language may democratize subtle analytical capabilities throughout organizations.
Nonetheless, questions persist about whether or not these reasoning capabilities will translate successfully to messier real-world challenges. The mathematical olympiad supplies well-defined issues with clear success standards — a far cry from the ambiguous, multifaceted choices that outline most enterprise and scientific endeavors.
Google DeepMind plans to return to subsequent 12 months’s competitors “in the hunt for an ideal rating.” The corporate believes AI methods combining pure language fluency with rigorous reasoning “will turn into invaluable instruments for mathematicians, scientists, engineers, and researchers, serving to us advance human data on the trail to AGI.”
However maybe probably the most telling element emerged from the competitors itself: when confronted with the competition’s most troublesome downside, Gemini began from an incorrect speculation and by no means recovered. Solely 5 human college students solved that downside accurately. Ultimately, it appears, even gold medal-winning AI nonetheless has one thing to study from teenage mathematicians.
