AI photos aren’t going anyplace. If something, 2025 has made it clear that generated visuals are solely getting extra convincing — and meaning the demand for dependable detection instruments is larger than ever.
Two names that come up typically on this house are TruthScan and SightEngine. Each declare to detect AI-generated content material and assist customers separate actual photos from artificial ones. However whereas they share the identical mission, their approaches and focus areas are very totally different.
So which one truly does it higher? Let’s dig in.
What’s TruthScan?
TruthScan is a full-stack AI detection suite constructed for groups who want solutions quick and at scale. You get six instruments out of the field — AI Textual content Detector (99%+ accuracy), AI Picture Detector (with real-time evaluation), Actual-time AI Detector (always-on monitoring), Deepfake Detector (video forensics), and AI Voice Detector (voice-clone protection).
For this comparability, the star is the AI Picture Detector. It doesn’t simply drop a binary verdict. You get a confidence rating plus context that helps clarify the decision — the sort of transparency that issues to editors, researchers, belief & security groups, and types that may’t afford a false optimistic.
As a result of TruthScan additionally runs with deepfake, textual content, and voice detectors, it additionally performs properly in multi-modal investigations the place a picture isn’t the one questionable asset.
Backside line: it’s not a pastime device. It’s infrastructure.
What’s SightEngine?
SightEngine positions itself as a content material moderation powerhouse. Its platform doesn’t simply deal with AI detection — it covers all the pieces from nudity and violence detection to spam filtering, profile picture validation, and even publicity/high quality evaluation.
That broader protection makes it interesting for giant platforms managing large quantities of content material. Key options embrace:
- AI Picture Detection: Flags generative AI photos and deepfakes.
- Picture & Video Moderation: 110 lessons throughout nudity, violence, hate, medication, weapons, and so forth.
- Textual content Moderation: Scans for profanity, hateful language, or inappropriate content material.
- Circumvention Detection: Identifies hidden hyperlinks, QR codes, or makes an attempt to bypass platform guidelines.
- Spam & Duplicate Management: Flags repetitive or near-duplicate content material.
- High quality Checks: Assesses blurriness, dangerous framing, and lighting.
It’s quick, scalable, and API-friendly — clearly designed with builders in thoughts. However that “cowl all the pieces” method means AI detection is only one characteristic amongst many, not the primary focus.
TruthScan vs. SightEngine: AI Picture Detection Correctness
Check #1
Truthscan: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 97%
SightEngine: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 99%
Check #2
Truthscan: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 98%
SightEngine: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 91%
Check #3
Truthscan: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 98%
SightEngine: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 79%
Check #4
Truthscan: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 97%
SightEngine: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 99%
Check #5
Truthscan: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 98%
SightEngine: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 99%
Check #6
Truthscan: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 98%
SightEngine: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 99%
Check #7
Truthscan: Appropriately labeled picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 97%
SightEngine: Not sure of the picture’s origin.
AI Chance Rating: 41%
Common Rating
Wrapping Up
SightEngine is a powerful moderation platform — quick, API-ready, and stacked with classification protection that makes coverage groups’ jobs simpler. In case your high aim is platform security and also you wish to centralize nudity, violence, textual content toxicity, and high quality checks below one roof, it’s a wise selection.
However when it comes particularly to AI picture detection, the numbers don’t lie. In testing, TruthScan hit 97.71% correctness, whereas SightEngine landed at 86.71%.
That hole issues. For moderation, 86% is likely to be “adequate.” Nice, even. However when you’re in journalism, analysis, or fraud prevention — the place a false optimistic or missed faux can have actual penalties — that 10-point lead is an enormous deal.
TruthScan is just extra correct. And in 2025, when AI-generated photos are in all places, that distinction makes it the clear winner.
