India has proposed a compulsory royalty system for AI firms that practice their fashions on copyrighted content material — a transfer that might reshape how OpenAI and Google function in what has already turn into one in every of their most essential and fastest-growing markets globally.
On Tuesday, India’s Division for Promotion of Trade and Inner Commerce launched a proposed framework that might give AI firms entry to all copyrighted works for coaching in alternate for paying royalties to a brand new amassing physique composed of rights-holding organizations, with funds then distributed to creators. The proposal argues that this “obligatory blanket license” would decrease compliance prices for AI corporations whereas guaranteeing that writers, musicians, artists, and different rights holders are compensated when their work is scraped to coach business fashions.
India’s proposal comes amid mounting considerations in international markets over how AI firms practice their fashions on copyrighted materials, a observe that has triggered lawsuits from authors, information organizations, artists, and different rights holders within the U.S. and Europe. Courts and regulators are nonetheless weighing whether or not such coaching qualifies as truthful use, leaving AI corporations working below authorized uncertainty and permitting them to quickly broaden their enterprise with out clear laws.
Not like the U.S. and the European Union, the place policymakers are debating transparency obligations and fair-use boundaries, India is proposing one of the interventionist approaches but by giving AI firms computerized entry to copyrighted materials in alternate for obligatory cost.
The eight-member committee, shaped by the Indian authorities in late April, argues the system would keep away from years of authorized uncertainty whereas guaranteeing creators are compensated from the outset.
Defending the system, the committee says in a 125-page submission (PDF) {that a} blanket license “goals to offer an quick access to content material for AI builders… cut back transaction prices… [and] guarantee truthful compensation for rightsholders,” calling it the least burdensome option to handle large-scale AI coaching. The submission provides that the only amassing physique would perform as a “single window,” eliminating the necessity for particular person negotiations and enabling royalties to move to each registered and unregistered creators.
The committee additionally factors to India’s rising significance as a marketplace for GenAI instruments. Citing OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s comment that India is the corporate’s second-largest market after the U.S. and “could properly turn into our largest,” it argues that as a result of AI corporations derive vital income from Indian customers whereas counting on Indian creators’ work to coach their fashions, a portion of that worth ought to move again to these creators. That, it says, is a part of the rationale for establishing a “balanced framework” that ensures compensation.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026
India’s proposal lands amid intensifying authorized battles worldwide over whether or not AI firms can lawfully use copyrighted materials to coach their fashions.
In India, information company ANI sued OpenAI within the Delhi Excessive Court docket, arguing its articles had been used with out permission — a case that has prompted the courtroom to look at whether or not AI coaching is itself an act of copy or protected by “truthful dealing.” Courts within the U.S. and Europe are confronting comparable disputes, with creators alleging that tech firms have constructed their fashions on unlicensed content material.
AI proposal sees pushback and dissent
Not everyone seems to be satisfied by the Indian authorities’s proposed mannequin, although.
Nasscom, the business physique representing know-how corporations, together with Google and Microsoft, filed a proper dissent arguing that India ought to as a substitute undertake a broad text-and-data-mining exception that might enable AI builders to coach on copyrighted content material so long as the fabric is lawfully accessed. It warned {that a} obligatory licensing regime might gradual innovation and stated rightsholders who object must be allowed to decide out slightly than power firms to pay for all coaching knowledge.
The Enterprise Software program Alliance, which represents international tech corporations, together with Adobe, Amazon Internet Providers, and Microsoft, pressed the Indian authorities to keep away from a purely licensing-based regime. It urged India to introduce an specific text-and-data-mining exception, arguing that “relying solely on direct or statutory licensing for AI coaching knowledge could also be impractical and will not yield the very best outcomes.”
Limiting AI fashions to smaller units of licensed or public-domain materials, BSA warned, might cut back mannequin high quality and “improve the chance that outputs merely replicate tendencies and biases of the restricted coaching knowledge units,” including {that a} clear TDM exception would higher stability innovation and rights holders’ pursuits.
The committee didn’t think about each a broad text-and-data-mining exception and an opt-out mannequin, arguing that such methods both undermine copyright protections or are inconceivable to implement. As a substitute, it proposed a “hybrid mannequin” that might grant AI corporations computerized entry to all lawfully accessible copyrighted works whereas requiring them to pay royalties into the central amassing physique that distributes the proceeds to creators.
The Indian authorities has now opened the proposal for public session, giving firms and different stakeholders 30 days to submit their feedback. After reviewing the suggestions, the committee will finalize its suggestions earlier than the framework is taken up by the federal government.
OpenAI and Google didn’t reply to requests for feedback.
