15.8 C
New York
Monday, June 16, 2025

Buy now

Midjourney V7 vs. OpenAI’s 4o: Which Generates Better Text on Images?

AI picture technology has come a good distance. We’ve moved previous the period of six-fingered arms and cursed typography, and we’re now at some extent the place folks really anticipate AI to generate usable photos — together with these with readable textual content.

That’s the place issues get attention-grabbing. As a result of whereas most instruments can create fairly visuals, not many can deal with textual content correctly. And let’s be actual — in case your use case entails signage, infographics, and even UI mockups, that’s an enormous deal.

So immediately, we’re evaluating Midjourney V7 and OpenAI’s GPT-4o head-to-head in a single very particular class: how nicely they generate textual content on photos. I’ll present you precisely what every mannequin can do utilizing the identical prompts, and we’ll discover out which one is extra dependable.

What’s Midjourney V7?

Midjourney is an AI picture technology instrument that focuses on aesthetics and visible storytelling. As a substitute of chasing realism, it goals to create visually interesting, typically stylized outputs that lean into creativity. In case you’ve ever seen AI artwork trending on-line, there’s an excellent likelihood it got here from Midjourney.

Its newest model, v7, gives stronger immediate understanding, higher visible readability, and improved dealing with of composition and lighting. You’ll be able to generate something from digital artwork to photorealistic landscapes with little or no immediate tweaking. It’s particularly helpful for artists, designers, and content material creators who need quick visuals with out sacrificing high quality.

What’s OpenAI’s 4o Picture Era?

GPT-4o’s picture technology is OpenAI’s most refined mannequin but. Constructed into ChatGPT, it permits you to generate high-quality visuals instantly from a textual content immediate — no third-party instruments or sophisticated interfaces wanted. It’s quick, responsive, and extra correct than any of OpenAI’s earlier picture instruments.

See also  How AI is Revolutionizing Location Accuracy in GPS-Denied Environments

Its greatest improve is how nicely it handles textual content in photos. For the primary time, you possibly can embody detailed written content material in your prompts — like indicators, labels, or product descriptions — and get outcomes which can be really readable and accurately formatted. 

This can be a main step up from DALL-E 3, which regularly turned phrases into random symbols. Now, you possibly can generate issues like infographics, UI mockups, and academic visuals with out having to manually edit the output. Total, primarily based on my testing, GPT-4o delivers robust, usable photos — particularly for those who want visuals with dependable textual content.

Midjourney V7 vs. OpenAI’s 4o: Textual content Era

Immediate: A barbershop emblem. The title of the barbershop is “Barber’s Tales”

We’re beginning easy with this one, and each Midjourney and 4o carried out nicely. Each adopted the immediate and generated the phrases “Barber’s Story” with out messing up. I’ll say although, 4o was loads easier, however Midjourney had a extra artistic tackle the brand — deserving of additional factors. 

Take a look at #2: Blackboard

Immediate: A nonetheless from a stereotypical 90s sitcom. A trainer in a classroom. He is in his 60s. He is sporting a checkered shirt. It is 7am. He is writing the next on the blackboard:
“Newton’s Legal guidelines of Movement””One: Objects keep nonetheless or transfer until influenced.””Two: Drive equals mass occasions acceleration””Three: Each motion has an equal reverse response.”

This time, I attempted an extended immediate, and Midjourney utterly did not ship. It’s simply full non-sense. Not one of the phrases had been right. If speaking about textual content technology solely, this is able to be a zero out of ten. I’ll give it some extent for following the “90s sitcom” a part of the immediate although, however that’s about all there may be to it.

See also  Google's viral AI podcast tool can chat in over 50 languages now and it aced my Spanish test

Then again, 4o is totally right. No missed phrases, misformed letters, or further artifacts. That is textual content technology at its peak. 

Take a look at #3: Mileage Signal

Immediate: A mileage signal taken by a cellphone. The content material of the signal have to be as follows: Line 1: “Manila” “10.1KM” Line 2: “Antipolo” “20.4KM” Line 3: “Batangas” “34.5KM” Line 4: “Quezon” “49.44KM” Line 5: “Naga” “142.4KM”

Identical story because the one above. 4o created the right mileage signal. Not solely are the phrases flawless — it’s completely aligned, accurately labelled, and appropriately spaced too. Midjourney 7, nevertheless, was none of these issues. It looks as if the one factor Midjourney is sweet at is nailing down the non-text technology facets of every immediate.

Take a look at #4: Recreation Screenshot

Immediate: A screencap of an old-school GBA RPG (darkish fantasy) with a knight speaking to a necromancer. His dialog says:
“You may have reigned for too lengthy.””It’s now time to satisfy your destiny.”

When it comes to following the immediate, each actually did nicely to seize the “old-school GBA RPG darkish fantasy” vibes right here. 

But when we’re speaking about textual content technology, yep… Midjourney is once more the loser right here. At this level, it’s grow to be clear to me that Midjourney doesn’t actually get textual content nonetheless, even with their latest replace. This was a brief textual content too, so I sort of anticipated it to do comparatively okay, however no luck.

Take a look at #5: Teenager’s Diary

Immediate: A young person’s diary, whereby the next is written: 
“April 27”
“Ugh, immediately was such a multitude. First, I completely bombed my math quiz (like, significantly, who even must know what a hypotenuse is?), and THEN Emma determined to sit down with them at lunch like we weren’t even associates?? I pretended to not care but it surely kinda harm. On the brilliant facet, Josh smiled at me within the hallway (!!!) and I principally floated all the best way to English class. Possibly immediately wasn’t a whole catastrophe in spite of everything. Gonna binge some tacky rom-coms tonight and faux my life is that dramatic.”

See also  6 New ChatGPT Projects Features You Need to Know

For this one, I needed to strive actually lengthy paragraphs. Midjourney is, predictively at this level, simply giving me nonsense textual content together with the picture.

The actual story right here is how 4o nonetheless manages to put in writing completely even with an extended paragraph of textual content. That is remarkable in AI picture technology. 4o is clearly a reduce above the remainder.

Take a look at #6: Store Names

Immediate: An actual picture taken by an iPhone (or any smartphone) of three small shops subsequent to one another. The primary one is named “The Market” the second is “The Pet Store” and the final one is “The Tech Retailer”.

We don’t even want one other one at this level, however hey, possibly Midjourney can win one…

…but it surely didn’t. It nonetheless fell approach wanting what OpenAI’s 4o picture technology can provide.

The Backside Line

Yep, this one’s no contest in any respect. At the same time as a Midjourney fan, I need to concede that 4o is faaar higher on textual content technology.

Although Midjourney V7 has made large enhancements in visible high quality, lighting, and immediate interpretation, it nonetheless can’t get textual content proper. Whether or not the immediate is brief or lengthy, easy or complicated, the output virtually at all times falls wanting readable — not to mention correct.

Then again, GPT-4o is clearly constructed for this. It not solely understands the construction of textual content but in addition locations it accurately inside photos: formatting, grammar, and even tone intact. That’s one thing we haven’t actually seen from different picture mills but.

That doesn’t imply Midjourney is out of date. In case your precedence is creative fashion, cinematic visuals, or aesthetic experimentation, it’s nonetheless the top-tier selection. However for those who want textual content to be legible, right, and positioned precisely the place it ought to be, GPT-4o is the higher instrument — by far.

On the finish of the day, it is dependent upon what you’re making an attempt to make. However for something involving phrases? This spherical goes to OpenAI.

Supply hyperlink

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles